Background
In
the first half of October, 2005,
a number of digital camera and
camcorder manufacturers issued
service advisories involving a
range of digital camera models
(as well as some digital
camcorders and PDAs that
incorporate image sensors). In
each case, the story was similar
- CCD (image sensor) failures,
particularly in conditions of
high heat and humidity, led to
cameras capturing images with
either no picture at all, or
with extreme distortion and
severe purple or green color
casts. An example of the latter
symptom, courtesy of the Konica
Minolta Europe website, can be
seen further down this page. We
first started hearing about this
problem in late September and
early October, 2005, with a
significant increase in reader
emails about it in the first
week of October. The problem
understandably caused
considerable concern among our
readers, with many wondering
whether this was an ongoing
problem that could affect
current cameras.
Initial
service advisories by Sony,
Canon, Fujifilm and Konica
Minolta were soon followed by
announcements by Nikon, Ricoh,
and Olympus. Affected cameras
were all manufactured between
2002 and 2004, the underlying
problems have apparently been
found and corrected, so no
cameras currently on the market
are affected. (We are assured by
sources that new cameras
purchased today will not be
affected by this problem. See
the "What
caused this problem"
section at the bottom of this
document, for a more detailed
discussion of possible causes.)
It
appears that the problems trace
to certain models of image
sensor chips manufactured by
Sony between 2002 and 2004.
(Fujifilm has stated that they
manufacture their own CCD chips,
so it's not clear whether or not
the problems with their cameras
are in fact related to those of
the other makers.)
What the problem looks
like
The problem can take any of
several forms, but all involve
severe color shifts and/or
severe distortions of the image.
The images below show two
examples (courtesy of Konica
Minolta) of what the problem
might look like, if your camera
falls prey to it. In the early
stages of the problem, the
camera may still capture
recognizable images, but with a
washed-out appearance and a
strong magenta or green tint.
 |
|
(Images courtesy Konica
Minolta) |
 |
|
(Image courtesy Tara
D.S. Willgues) |
What products may be
affected?
Quite a number of
products may develop this
problem, including digital
cameras, camcorders, and even
PDAs (Personal Digital
Assistants) that incorporate an
image sensor. The following is a
list of affected models by
various manufacturers that we
are presently aware of. We will
update this list as new
information becomes available.
We recommend that you check the
site regularly for this and
other breaking news.
Here
are lists of the affected
products, grouped by
manufacturer:
| Canon |
|
Digital Cameras |
Camcorders |
-
PowerShot A60
-
PowerShot A70
-
PowerShot A75
-
PowerShot A300
-
PowerShot A310
-
PowerShot S230
Digital ELPH /
Digital IXUS V3 /
IXY D320
-
PowerShot SD100
Digital ELPH /
Digital IXUS II /
IXY Digital 30
-
PowerShot SD110
Digital ELPH /
Digital IXUS IIs /
IXY Digital 30a
|
-
MV600i
-
MV630i
-
MV650i
-
MV700i
-
MV730i
-
MV750i
-
MV5i
-
MV5i MC
-
MV6i MC
-
ZR60
-
ZR65 MC
-
ZR70 MC
-
ZR80
-
ZR85
-
ZR90
-
Elura 40 MC
-
Elura 50
|
|
For repair instructions,
visit the
Canon USA support
website.
To read the specific
service advisory for
your model, use the
pulldown menus to browse
for your specific model,
or simply type the model
number into the box
provided at the bottom
of the page and click
the "Search" button.
The Canon support
website holds no forms
or other needed
documents, so you can
save yourself some time
(if you live in the US
or Puerto Rico by just
calling the Canon
Customer Support line at
1-800-828-4040. Support
hours are Monday-Friday
8am to 12 midnight, and
Saturday from 10am-8pm.
(All times EST.)
Alternately, you can
send email to:
carecenter@cits.canon.com.
For your easy reference,
here is a link to the
original IR news story
on the Canon advisory. |
| Fujifilm |
|
Digital Cameras |
|
Model |
Serial Number Range(s) |
|
•
FinePix A303 |
3JA4**** to 3JA5**** |
|
•
FinePix F410 |
32A1****,
32A6**** to 32A7****,
32A9**** |
|
•
FinePix F700
|
3JA4**** to 3JA5**** |
|
•
FinePix S2 Pro
|
31A127**~31A143**
32A000**~32A039**
33A000**~33A007**
34A000**~34A004** |
|
Serial numbers can be
found on the bottom of
the cameras. From the
Fuji service advisor,
the following applies to
US customers:
IF
SERVICE IS NEEDED:
Package the camera
carefully using ample
padded material to
prevent damage in
transit. Include your
name, address and phone
number with the shipment
as well as a general
description of the
problem. Keep a record
of the camera's serial
number and shipment
tracking number. Ship
your camera to the Fuji
Service Center noted
below:
Fuji Photo Film U.S.A.,
Inc.
1100 King George Post
Rd.
Edison, NJ 08837
Attn: Camera Repair
Dept./CCD Advisory
For your easy reference,
here is a link to the
original IR news story
on the Fujifilm advisory. |
| Olympus |
|
Digital Cameras |
-
Camedia C-5050 Zoom
-
Camedia C-730 Ultra
Zoom
|
|
Olympus is
distinguishing
themselves by offering
to repair affected
cameras, even if they
aren't displaying the
problem yet. Their free
repair policy is
extended for up to four
years from the original
purchase date. They do
ask that, if your camera
is currently operating
properly, you hold off
on sending it in until
after January 2006, due
to the high volume of
repair business during
the holiday season. To
determine if your camera
is affected, call
Olympus repair at
888-553-4448,
Monday-Friday, 8am -10pm
EST, or email to
customersupport@olympus.com.
See the
Olympus PDF file
explaining the above for
further info.
For your easy reference,
here is a link to the
original IR news story
on the Olympus advisory. |
| Pentax |
|
Digital Cameras |
-
Optio330RS
-
Optio330GS
-
Optio33L
-
Optio43WR
-
Optio550
-
Optio555
|
|
Pentax USA have
published a brief note
on their
Customer Care & Support
homepage
which refers customers
to a separate
PDF file
for further information.
This document pledges
repair of the problem
free of charge,
regardless of warranty
status, as long as the
camera doesn't have
other symptoms not
described as part of the
problem.
This PDF document in
turn refers customers to
a
separate PDF form
which must be filled in,
and includes
instructions on how to
return a camera for
service. The return
address from the form
is:
PENTAX Service
Department
12000 Zuni Street –
Suite 100B
Westminster CO 80234
We
couldn't find any
details regarding the
duration of the free
repair offer, nor of
serial numbers affected.
We suggest you simply
contact Pentax for
clarification of these
points.
For your easy reference,
here is a link to the
original IR news story
on the Pentax advisory. |
| Ricoh |
|
Digital Cameras |
-
Caplio RR30
-
Caplio 300G
-
Caplio G3
-
Caplio G3 model M
-
Caplio G3 model S
-
Caplio ProG3
-
Caplio G4
-
Caplio G4 wide
-
Caplio 400G wide
-
Caplio RX
|
|
Ricoh US support took a
little digging to track
down. Ricoh Global
issued the
service advisory
itself. Service centers
for various regions
around the globe are
listed
here.
US, Canada, and South
American service for
Ricoh cameras is handled
by:
C.R.I.S. Camera Services
Phone: 800-22 RICOH
Fax: 480-940-1329
www.criscam.com
Email: <ricoh@criscam.com>
We
couldn't find any
details regarding the
duration of the free
repair offer, nor of
serial numbers affected.
We suggest you simply
contact C.R.I.S Camera
Services directly to
learn how to proceed.
For your easy reference,
here is a link to the
original IR news story
on the Ricoh advisory. |
| Sony |
|
Digital Cameras |
Camcorders, CCD-TRV
models |
-
Cyber-shot DSC-F717
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P10
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P12
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P2
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P31
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P32
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P51
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P52
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P7
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P71
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P72
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P8
-
Cyber-shot DSC-P92
-
Cyber-shot DSC-U10
-
Cyber-shot DSC-U20
-
Cyber-shot DSC-U30
-
Cyber-shot DSC-U60
-
Cyber-shot DSC-V1
-
CD Mavica MVC-CD250
-
CD Mavica MVC-CD400
-
CD Mavica MVC-CD500
-
FD Mavica MVC-FD100
-
FD Mavica MVC-FD200
|
-
CCD-TRV107E
-
CCD-TRV118
-
CCD-TRV128
-
CCD-TRV218E
-
CCD-TRV228
-
CCD-TRV228E
-
CCD-TRV318
-
CCD-TRV328
-
CCD-TRV418
-
CCD-TRV418E
-
CCD-TRV428
-
CCD-TRV428E
|
|
Camcorders, DCR-DVD
models |
-
DCR-DVD100
-
DCR-DVD100E
-
DCR-DVD101
-
DCR-DVD101E
-
DCR-DVD200
-
DCR-DVD200E
-
DCR-DVD300
-
DCR-DVD91E
|
|
Camcorders, DCR-TRV
models |
Camcorders, DCR-IP
models |
-
DCR-TRV147E
-
DCR-TRV14E
-
DCR-TRV16
-
DCR-TRV16E
-
DCR-TRV18
-
DCR-TRV18E
-
DCR-TRV19
-
DCR-TRV19E
-
DCR-TRV22
-
DCR-TRV22E
-
DCR-TRV240E
-
DCR-TRV24E
-
DCR-TRV25
-
DCR-TRV250
-
DCR-TRV250E
-
DCR-TRV255E
-
DCR-TRV25E
-
DCR-TRV260
-
DCR-TRV265
-
DCR-TRV265E
-
DCR-TRV27
-
DCR-TRV27E
-
DCR-TRV33
-
DCR-TRV33E
-
DCR-TRV340
-
DCR-TRV340E
-
DCR-TRV361
-
DCR-TRV38
-
DCR-TRV38E
-
DCR-TRV39
-
DCR-TRV40
-
DCR-TRV40E
-
DCR-TRV460
-
DCR-TRV460E
-
DCR-TRV461E
-
DCR-TRV50
-
DCR-TRV50E
-
DCR-TRV740
-
DCR-TRV740E
-
DCR-TRV840
-
DCR-TRV940
-
DCR-TRV940E
-
DCR-TRV950
-
DCR-TRV950E
|
-
DCR-IP45
-
DCR-IP45E
-
DCR-IP5
-
DCR-IP55
-
DCR-IP55E
-
DCR-IP5E
-
DCR-IP7E
|
|
Camcorders, DCR-PC
models |
-
DCR-PC101
-
DCR-PC101E
-
DCR-PC103E
-
DCR-PC104E
-
DCR-PC105
-
DCR-PC105E
-
DCR-PC106E
-
DCR-PC107E
-
DCR-PC108
-
DCR-PC108E
-
DCR-PC115
-
DCR-PC115E
-
DCR-PC120
-
DCR-PC120E
|
|
Camcorders, DCR-VX
models |
-
DCR-VX2000
-
DCR-VX2000E
-
DCR-VX2100
-
DCR-VX2100E
|
|
Camcorders, DCR-HC
models |
-
DCR-HC14E
-
DCR-HC15
-
DCR-HC15E
-
DCR-HC16E
-
DCR-HC18E
-
DCR-HC20
-
DCR-HC20E
-
DCR-HC30
-
DCR-HC30E
|
|
CLIE Handheld Computer
Models |
Professional Camcorders
(DVCAM format) |
|
|
-
DSR-250 & DSR-250/P
-
DSR-PD150 &
DSR-PD150P
-
DSR-PD170 &
DSR-PD170P
-
DSR-PDX10 &
DSR-PDX10P
|
| |
|
|
As
Sony is the original
sensor manufacturer for
all of the other
manufacturers' products
listed above (and given
the vast array of
products that they
manufacture themselves)
it should come as no
great surprise that Sony
has by far, the greatest
number of affected
products. This should
not be taken as
indicating any inherent
deficiency in Sony
products beyond the now
discontinued sensors
involved.
The
original service
advisory
was posted on the Sony
Asia Pacific Support
site. The Asia Pacific
post lists all affected
models in a concise
format. On the Sony US
website, the advisories
are only listed on the
support pages for each
individual product. To
see the information for
your product, go to this
page, enter your model
number and click
"Search" to find all
relevant information. If
your product is one of
those listed above, you
should see a link
(probably dated
10/3/2005) under the
"Product Alerts"
section, titled
"Important Notice about
your Sony Product."
Regardless, in the US,
the story is the same
(at least it is for all
the products we
checked): "From October
3, 2005 through October
2, 2007, Sony will
repair, free of charge,
affected products
exhibiting the
above-mentioned problem
where it is caused by
the image sensor device.
Sony will also cover the
cost of shipping and
handling to service to
correct this issue."
No
service forms or mailing
addresses are provided
on the Sony US site.
Rather, owners are
instructed to contact
the Sony Customer
Information Services
Center for further
assistance at
1-866-703-7669.
For your easy reference,
here is a link to the
original IR news story
on the Sony advisory. |
What to do if you have
an affected product:
In all cases, the
manufacturers involved are
offering free repair of affected
products, even if the original
warranty period has expired. If
you have a product that displays
the problem described here,
you must contact the
manufacturer to arrange for the
repair. This is
important. -- None of the
manufacturers involved are
contacting consumers to announce
a blanket recall: It's up to the
consumer to contact them to take
advantage of the free repair
service.
Can I send in a product
on the list, even if it isn't
showing the problem yet?
In most cases, the
answer is unfortunately no.
While all the manufacturers
involved have offered to repair
affected devices, even if they
are out of warranty, only
Olympus has so far offered to
perform preventative service on
units that aren't yet showing
the problem. Depending on
variations in the manufacturing
process, the amount of use a
product has seen, and
(apparently) the environmental
conditions in which it was used,
it's quite possible that a
product built around one of the
affected sensor chips may never
show the problem. On the other
hand, a camera that's working
fine today could easily fail
next week. We highly applaud the
approach taken by Olympus, of
offering to repair affected
units, even if they aren't
currently exhibiting the
problem.
If there are other
problems with my product, will
the manufacturer fix those at
the same time?
Not for free. While it would
certainly make sense to go ahead
and have any other needed
repairs performed while your
product is once back at the
manufacturer, the policy across
the board has been that only
the CCD repair will be performed
for free. Any other needed
repair or maintenance will be
billed at normal rates.
Is there a time limit on
the offered repairs?
Possibly. In most
cases, the manufacturers
involved have simply issued
service advisories and said that
they'll repair affected devices
regardless of whether the
original warranty had expired.
Most manufacturers aren't
specifying a time limit. Two
exceptions are Olympus, who has
set a time limit of four years
from the date of initial
purchase, and Sony, who has set
a cutoff point of October 2,
2007 for their free-repair offer
(at least, all the products we
explicitly checked on Sony's US
service website showed that time
limit).
What if I've already
paid to have a product showing
this problem repaired, outside
the warranty period?
In most cases, there's
good news for you, provided you
have a record of the repair and
your payment for it. We don't
have an exhaustive list of the
policies of all the
manufacturers involved, but many
appear to be offering a refund
of repair charges if
non-warranty service was
performed to correct this
problem. Contact the
manufacturer in question. If you
have copies of the service
records and proof of payment,
there's a good chance that you
can get a refund for the service
expense.
Is it safe to buy a
digital camera today? Is the
problem fixed?
While we can't predict
the future, it certainly sounds
like this particular problem has
been put to bed. Based on what
we've heard from our industry
contacts, the first inklings of
the problem surfaced as far back
as sometime in early 2004.
Whatever its cause (see below
for a range of theories), the
issue apparently was researched
and solved at a manufacturing
level by March of 2004. Given
the extraordinary impact that it
had, it seems safe to say that
manufacturers will be
particularly vigilant that this
particular problem doesn't
recur. Beyond that, we feel that
the responsible manner in which
the industry is dealing with it
bodes well for the future,
should anything of similar scope
occur again. We don't think
there's any reason to have any
hesitation in purchasing a new
digital camera at this time.
What caused the problem?
If you have an affected camera,
you probably don't care too much
about what the underlying
problem was, as long as you can
get it fixed. If you're the
technically curious type though,
here's a synopsis of the
information we've been able to
assemble about the underlying
cause.
Several
different explanations for this
problem have been put forward by
various parties. Our own
industry contacts indicated that
the problem was caused by the
use of epoxy chip packages for
the failing sensor units, rather
than more robust (and also much
more expensive) ceramic
packages. The environmental
sealing of epoxy circuit
packaging is generally not as
good as that of ceramic
packaging, and in the case of
the failing sensors appears to
have let moisture enter the chip
cavity itself. This seemed to be
a quite plausible explanation,
but subsequently, two other
possible causes came to our
attention.
An
article published by Japan's
Nikkei Business Publications
agreed that the sensors in
question were sourced from fabs
operated by Sony Corp., but
provided a different reason for
the failures. According to
Nikkei journalist Naoki Asakawa,
the problem was twofold: Changed
settings on a wire bonding
system resulted in weaker joints
between wires and electrodes;
and iodine-bearing bonding
compound vaporized inside the
CCD package which further
decayed the joint surface.
Nikkei reported that Sony
removed the iodine compound from
its CCD manufacturing process,
and said that the company also
introduced a test for bonding
strength in March 2004.
Finally, an email from reader
Paul Taylor pointed us toward
another possibility. We've since
heard from several readers that
they were able to get failing
cameras to work again for short
periods, either by bumping or
flexing the camera chassis. This
is obviously something we do not
recommend trying, as it could
damage other components in your
camera and lead to expensive
repair bills. Still, given that
little if any force could be
transferred through the sensor
package by these methods, it
does hint at another problem
coming into play in at least
some cameras. Paul theorized
that the zero insertion force (ZIF)
connectors and flex cables
inside the camera might not be
providing sufficiently good
contact, and mechanical action
on the camera body could move
the cables inside the connectors
enough to temporarily improve
the situation.
Regardless of whether the
problem is one or more of the
above, or something else
entirely, the important thing to
note is that the manufacturers
are doing an admirable job of
standing behind their products.
In every advisory that's been
issued to date, the company
involved has stated that it will
fix the problem regardless of
warranty status of the affected
cameras. Not only is this good
news for customers who own
affected cameras, but it is
certainly encouraging for those
consumers buying new cameras
today and in the future. And to
reiterate... We are assured that
current and recent models are
not affected by this sensor
problem.
This
information was put together by
www.imaging-resource.com